Axelle Berthoumieu from France has received a 12-match ban after being convicted of biting Aoife Wafer of Ireland in a match at the 2025 Women’s Rugby World Cup. The verdict, reported by tournament officials, quickly ignited discussion within the rugby world, as it stands as one of the harshest sanctions in recent tournament editions.
The altercation took place during a tightly contested match between France and Ireland, where both sides fought to secure their positions in the group stage. In a moment of close contact, cameras and match officials caught Berthoumieu engaging in conduct deemed unacceptable by international rugby standards. Following the incident, Wafer required medical attention, though she was able to continue playing, showing remarkable resilience and composure. The disciplinary committee reviewed footage, statements, and referee reports before reaching its conclusion, which was then shared publicly to ensure transparency.
The severity of the sanction and its implications
The 12-match suspension given to Berthoumieu represents not just a personal challenge for the French athlete but also a disadvantage for her national squad, as it loses a seasoned player during a crucial phase of the tournament. Rugby officials highlighted that the decision was influenced by established guidelines aimed at maintaining safety, honesty, and fairness in the sport. World Rugby’s rules regard biting as a grave misconduct, with penalties that can vary from moderate suspensions to extended bans, based on the severity of the incident and its impact.
For France, the absence of Berthoumieu means reshuffling their tactical plans and relying on alternative options to fill the gap. Analysts have pointed out that such an incident can affect team morale, as it not only diminishes the squad’s depth but also raises questions about discipline and composure under pressure. On the other side, Ireland’s Wafer has been praised for her professionalism in handling the situation, avoiding escalation and maintaining focus on the match.
Reaction from the rugby community
Reactions to the sanction have been varied, though most stakeholders agree that the punishment was necessary. Fans, commentators, and former players have expressed concern that incidents like these could tarnish the reputation of women’s rugby at a time when the sport is expanding its audience. Many have applauded the decisive stance taken by the disciplinary committee, viewing it as a strong message that dangerous conduct will not be tolerated.
Social media has amplified the discussion, with supporters of both nations debating the fairness of the punishment. While some argue that the 12-match suspension is excessively harsh, others believe it is proportionate and serves as a deterrent for future cases. Former international players have weighed in, reminding current athletes of their responsibility to set an example, especially given the visibility of a World Cup. The consensus among rugby officials is that discipline must remain uncompromising in order to preserve the spirit of the game.
The broader context of discipline in women’s rugby
This case adds to a growing conversation about discipline and safety in women’s rugby. As the sport becomes more competitive and physical, ensuring player welfare has become a top priority for governing bodies. Infractions such as biting, high tackles, and dangerous ruck entries are being closely monitored, with stricter enforcement designed to minimize risks and encourage respect among players.
The Women’s Rugby World Cup has become a showcase not only of athletic excellence but also of the values associated with rugby: respect, integrity, and solidarity. Officials are keen to reinforce these principles, using high-profile cases like Berthoumieu’s to underline the importance of discipline. The hope is that decisive actions will serve as an educational tool for players at all levels, from grassroots clubs to the professional stage.
A surprising breakthrough
Para Axelle Berthoumieu, la suspensión marca un punto de inflexión en su carrera. Perderse 12 partidos en el contexto del rugby internacional es un retroceso significativo, tanto en tiempo de juego como en reputación. Su capacidad para recuperar su imagen dependerá de cómo responda a esta sanción y su comportamiento futuro. Para Francia, el enfoque inmediato será ajustar sus estrategias para compensar su ausencia, mientras abordan cuestiones sobre la disciplina dentro del equipo.
Ireland, on the other hand, carries on with its campaign where Wafer is not just acknowledged for her athletic prowess, but also seen as a representation of determination. The event has boosted her reputation and highlighted her skill in staying composed in difficult situations.
The disciplinary decision reflects a broader determination to safeguard rugby’s integrity as the sport continues to grow. By imposing strong sanctions on misconduct, officials aim to protect players, uphold the values of the game, and send a clear message to both participants and fans: respect and fair play remain non-negotiable, even on the biggest stage of all.
